[31422] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Fraizer)
Fri Sep 22 23:03:39 2000
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 23:01:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Fraizer <nanog@EnterZone.Net>
To: Aaron Moreau-Cook <aaronm@toothpick.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, William Waites <ww@pandora.styx.org>,
kai@pac-rim.net
In-Reply-To: <NBBBLOHMKJNEKAKJDMMIAECDHGAA.aaronm@toothpick.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009222253490.13052-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Aaron Moreau-Cook wrote:
> up getting only one /24. Then another upstream provider, quite large, forced
> another /24 upon us. When we stated we didn't need/want it, they said they
> could take it back but it was not standard practice; all DS3 customers get a
> /24. Anyway... Think of all the other companies out there who get treated
> like this?
Who's forcing address space on customers? It's like pulling teeth to get
address space from most of them!
---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc
