[31373] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: o/t: Re: Root zone change -- d.gtld-servers.net
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Wolfe)
Thu Sep 21 14:38:06 2000
Message-ID: <DA5C4C272E1CD311B5A90000F80434387B6364@SHASTA>
From: Tim Wolfe <TimW@InfoGroupNW.com>
To: 'Randy Bush' <randy@psg.com>
Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 11:18:50 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I think the point isn't so much that being UScentric is ok/not ok but rather
that for many providers, most of their DNS traffic is .com/.net related.
That being the case, there seems to be a good case for changes to
infrastructure for those TLDs being of interest to at least some NANOG
recipients... I know that when I was still wearing my ISP hat, our DNS
traffic was about 80% composed of either com or net queries..
--Tim
=============================================
Timothy M. Wolfe CCNA, NSA
Sr. Network Engineer timw@infogroupnw.com
InfoGroup Northwest 541.485.0957 x108
=============================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 11:04 AM
To: Roland Dobbins
Cc: Austin Schutz; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: o/t: Re: Root zone change -- d.gtld-servers.net
> What's wrong with being U.S.-centric?
jingism kinda went out of fashion shortly after the us's defeat in viet nam
randy
