[3137] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Address allocation stats
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@isi.edu)
Fri Jun 7 14:37:36 1996
From: bmanning@isi.edu
To: JimFleming@unety.net (Jim Fleming)
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 11:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, cidrd@iepg.org
In-Reply-To: <01BB5474.88D01B60@webster.unety.net> from "Jim Fleming" at Jun 7, 96 01:23:35 pm
> @ So lets not pick on BBN while the real problem is chomping on our respective
> @ hindends.
> @
> @ --bill
> @
>
> Why should anyone even care any more...there are
> no good fixes, the people that are in a position to
> fix things will never do it...and from an IPv8 point of
> view...the entire IPv4 address space is a TWD...
>
> --
> Jim Fleming
> UNETY Systems, Inc.
> Naperville, IL
>
Just curious, How did your missive enter into our TWD of
IPv4 anyway and why do you insist on remaining here
(unety.net) just to badger us, the poor sots who lack
your forsight and vison. I am happy with my heathen
ways and don't wish this new religion thrust down my
throat.
Of course many people I know of who have left IPv4, looked
at your IPv8 and decided that it is flawed and moved on..
to IPv10. In fact there are commercial implementations of
this code base now from a large number of vendors. Yup,
IPX is the wave of the future.... :)
--
--bill
