[31320] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: (O-T)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave McKay)
Tue Sep 19 17:04:39 2000
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 16:02:35 -0500
From: Dave McKay <dave@sneakerz.org>
To: dan@netrail.net
Cc: Dave McKay <dave@sneakerz.org>, Stephen Burd <sburd@tm.net>,
John Fraizer <nanog@EnterZone.Net>, Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>,
nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000919160235.A99907@sneakerz.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10009191650410.30582-100000@macdaddy.netrail.net>; from dan@netrail.net on Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 04:52:28PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Agreed,
Please excuse my previous statement about level3 engineers. It was ment
to be a private reply. (damn group reply!!) Its a personal opinion,
and should be taken as such. (Its possible, and most likely true that
l3 is a good provider, I just happened to speak with a not-so-bright
engineer.)
dan@netrail.net (dan@netrail.net) wrote:
> I've found that the vast majority of very large ISPs have clueful
> engineers. Hoever, like many routing problems, it's not a question that a
> host exists, it's a question of reachability. Many times there are clueful
> engineers, but there are so many layers between them and customers, they
> are very hard to access.
>
> Daniel Golding
> Director of R&D "I'm not evil. I'm just drawn that way"
> NetRail, Inc.
> 1-888-NetRail
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Dave McKay wrote:
>
> >
> > Good connectivity, but clueless engineers. Problem solving is not their
> > strong point.
> >
> > Stephen Burd (sburd@tm.net) wrote:
> > >
> > > hey, can someone tell me what they know about Level 3 Communications please?
> > >
> > > rsvp privately
> > >
> > > thank you
> > >
> > > -Stephen
> >
> > >
> > --
> > Dave McKay
> > dave@sneakerz.org
> > Network Engineer - Google Inc.
> >
>
--
Dave McKay
dave@sneakerz.org
Network Engineer - Google Inc.
