[3123] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Address allocation stats
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Manning)
Wed Jun 5 03:12:55 1996
From: bmanning@isi.edu (Bill Manning)
To: GAVRON@ACES.COM (Ehud Gavron)
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 00:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: bmanning@isi.edu, pferguso@cisco.com, markk@internic.net, cidrd@iepg.org,
nanog@merit.edu, pier@isi.edu, GAVRON@ACES.COM
In-Reply-To: <01I5J2SUMXOK0001VO@ACES.COM> from "Ehud Gavron" at Jun 5, 96 00:02:35 am
>
> >>
> >> Thank you, kind sir. This is exactly what I was looking for:
> >>
> >> [may '96 figures]
> >>
> >> Grand Total (Allocated and Assigned Combined)
> >> Class A - 127
> > 128 <-- :)
>
> Bit pattern 0xxxxxxx Class A (0-127)
> Bit pattern 10xxxxxx Class B (128-191)
> Bit pattern 110xxxxx Class C (192-223)
> Bit pattern 1110xxxx Class D (224-239)
>
> I give up. Where did I go wrong that I think net 128.x.y.z is in the
> old style class B range?
>
> >> Class B - 10150
> >> Class C - 764202
> >>
You did not go wrong, look at the way Paul did the distribution.
For that matter, look at you supplied bit patterns.
0 to 127 is how many? 128!! :)
(side note... Net zero will be harder to reclaim than net 127)
(any takers? :)
--
--bill
