[31154] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Lesher)
Thu Sep 14 12:01:07 2000
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Message-Id: <200009141602.MAA01879@sigma.nrk.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu (nanog list)
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:02:19 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: wb8foz@nrk.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Unnamed Administration sources reported that Brett Frankenberger said:
>
> Real CLECs -- those that try to serve a broad based market, rather than
> hack togethor a contrived market that will result in a high ration o
> finbound to outbound calls, will do fine in the absence of reciprocal
> compensation.
Suffice to say, senior communications attorneys disagree with you.
If you wish to debate that (non-NANOG) issue, come join the
CYBERTELECOM-L list where it's 100% on-topic.
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
