[31128] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: When IPv6 ... if ever?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Tue Sep 12 13:12:25 2000
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <200009121706.CAA10945@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009111158260.32867-100000@intrepid.vapour.net> from
batz at "Sep 11, 2000 12:02:47 pm"
To: batz <batsy@vapour.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 02:06:07 +0859 ()
Cc: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@MHSC.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Batz;
> Thus the reason for the initial question. Something along the
> lines of whether there would be performance or other incentives
> to deploy it.
As for the performance issue, can someone give me a pointer
to *INEXPENSIVE* NAT box which can operate at 100Mbps, or better,
1Gbps?
I was asked by ISPs which are beginning to offer 100Mbps Ethernet service
to subscribers.
My guess is that there is none.
Masataka Ohta
