[31125] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: When IPv6 ... if ever?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Tue Sep 12 07:50:06 2000
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <200009121137.UAA10061@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009111158260.32867-100000@intrepid.vapour.net> from
batz at "Sep 11, 2000 12:02:47 pm"
To: batz <batsy@vapour.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 20:37:16 +0859 ()
Cc: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@MHSC.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Batz;
> :> I am perfectly willing to deploy private-side IPv6, if I had a reason to
> :> do so.
> :
> :I am not, because I know I have no reason.
>
> Thus the reason for the initial question. Something along the
> lines of whether there would be performance or other incentives
> to deploy it.
There is none.
That's why IPv6 deployment should occur first in the public-side
with the incentive of an allocation of a lot of (e.g. 16 times
the number of subscribers without any usage required) IPv4
addresses as proposed in draft-ohta-address-allocation-00.txt.
Masataka Ohta
