[31103] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bryan Heitman)
Sat Sep 9 20:38:37 2000
Message-ID: <010001c01abf$30f34960$1100a8c0@communitech.net>
From: "Bryan Heitman" <bryanh@communitech.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 19:36:41 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Yes Erik we use AT&T, however that is for only local circuits. We don't
have any long haul with them which is probably why we're not seeing any
problems...
If I had to guess I would say that Kingdom City is in AT&Ts path that
connects KC and St. Louis. As it is about in the center of the state
directly east of KC.
Best,
Bryan Heitman, Vice-President
CommuniTech.Net, Inc. - (800) WEB-HOST
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Korab" <adam@inetnebr.com>
To: "Bryan Heitman" <bryanh@communitech.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 07:21:15PM -0500, Bryan Heitman wrote:
> > UU is claiming a fiber cut, however we utilize all local carriers with
> > numerous circuits which are all running fine.
>
> Thank you Bryan. Do you use AT&T? I was thinking that AT&T
> might be the "carrier" UUnet was referring to, and as I udnerstand, they
> were also having pretty major problems.
>
> --Adam
> --
> Adam Korab System Administration
> Internet Nebraska (402) 434-8680 x 110
>
> RFC 882 put the dot in .com, not Sun Microsystems
