[31024] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: PI or PA?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Cumming)
Wed Sep 6 08:55:08 2000
Message-ID: <9A37FA672058D4118456006008F5EC92011A12FC@berukexch06.ins.com>
From: James Cumming <james_cumming@ins.com>
To: Ray Davis <ray@carpe.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:49:07 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ray,
You'd be better off getting the customer to apply for a /24 of PI
space.
It is entirely possible for a provider to advertise address space
that belongs to a different provider although most providers will
refuse to do this as it requires co-operation between providers to
both set-up (and in future remove). Most providers tend to have a
standard portfolio of 'products' and these do not normally include
multi-homing clients with other service providers whilst using their
own address space.
A normal service to sell is transit, i.e.. routing a customers PI
space (and their AS). This way you need not care which other
provider the customer approaches, nor pay any attention to the set-up
process with that ISP as they are done independently.
James
- -----Original Message-----
From: Ray Davis [mailto:ray@carpe.net]
Sent: 05 September 2000 20:51
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: PI or PA?
A customer needs a /24 which is to be announced by us and other ASes
(including uunet). Should we just give them a /24 out of our space
or would it be better to apply for a /24 PI space?
Thanks,
Ray
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBObY9XDyrtEQtecfwEQJeRACgmbpWVGaQ/Go28OratCo3c/m3uHsAn3oM
Rfkxc28evO4gMEopGzsjS35R
=AXKc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----