[30975] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: When IPv6 ... if ever?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Sun Sep 3 09:56:24 2000
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <200009031349.WAA12580@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20000903023935.A26205@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com> from "Majdi S.
Abbas" at "Sep 3, 2000 02:39:35 am"
To: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 22:48:45 +0859 ()
Cc: smd@clock.org, nanog@merit.edu, nathan@terminus.com,
rmeyer@MHSC.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
msa;
> > Don't you think it a benefit that you are allocated a large block of
> > IPv4 address space if you support IPv6?
>
> At which point you say Thanks, use the new v4 addresses,
> and stall on your v6 implementation.
Read the draft.
The policy do require something.
However, the policy do not require IPv6 used.
The policy do not even require allocated IPv4 addresses used.
Masataka Ohta
