[30797] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Thu Aug 31 09:41:03 2000
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:36:03 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000831093603.A2913@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008310809420.2197-100000@labyrinth.local>; from emarshal@logic.net on Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0500, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
>=20
> But, you get the added benefit of MIME typing, human-beneficial markup,
> caching if you have a nearby cache, inherent firewall friendliness (no
> data connection foolishness), and simple negotiation of encrypted
> transfers (SSL). And for command-line people like myself, there's lynx,
> w3m, and wget.
And you lose the benefit of client-side choice as to binary or ascii
transfer mode.
Not that this isn't outweighed by all the things you gain, in most cases.
--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5rl9DEcl9bQ0RMt0RAk62AJ90SbuYNAHtFf3VJSmnuYHWqbKxVACgi/W3
Zhg5o/S1D/ZUNTvkeW2Ix5g=
=kcRn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK--
