[30619] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: DDOS attacks lately?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Sun Aug 20 10:04:21 2000

Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 09:59:23 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000820095923.A25970@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10008201452470.25797-100000@uplift.swm.pp.se>; from swmike@swm.pp.se on Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 03:00:18PM +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 03:00:18PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>=20
> A start would be to make it criminal negligence worldwide to operate a
> network that can be abused even after several notices about this fact.

This would be approximately equivalent to making it criminal negligence to
build a street wide enough to accomodate two car bombs at once.

Except, of course, that the latter case is far more important than some
search engine's web page.

The current move to try to improve traceability of packets is the right
solution.  Any solution that involves worldwide laws is a non-starter.


--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE5n+Q7Ecl9bQ0RMt0RAn8HAKCUl/Bj8npsnxV7/EEqQB6XjqK9GACgg5FN
LLcC/+5YItMl8GH1OfIFCpI=
=5gP/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post