[30528] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: spammers will move offshore?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland M.J. Meyer)
Thu Aug 10 14:50:38 2000
Reply-To: <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: "'Morgan Dollard'" <Morgan.Dollard@nscglobal.com>,
"'Derek J. Balling'" <dredd@megacity.org>,
"'Barry Shein'" <bzs@world.std.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:48:06 -0700
Message-ID: <000401c002fb$8624f630$aba4b9d0@PEREGRIN>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <ABDBDE9B3167D411B36200508B636E2003CC89@SW1_MZ_201>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Morgan Dollard
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 7:56 AM
>
> Im confuesed about the origin of this discussion, since i
> mised the kick
> off,
I simply asked if Telstra was still being black-holed. I got my
answer( they are) and it is done via a manual entry in the ORBS
list.
Now for the follow-up question, is anyone else, besides Telstra,
serving OZ?
AboveNet already confirmed that they aren't.
If the answer to that is negative, then we ought to re-think the
black-hole issue. Certainly, since my client is doing substantial
traffic with OZ, I will recommend that they drop ORBS like a bad
habit. It's impacting revenue. The latencies to OZ are bad
enough, without having to deal with black-hole happy fanatics.
SPAM is a side-issue here and not really relevent to losing
connectivity with an entire continent.