[30474] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sonoma Access
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Barrie Jones)
Tue Aug 8 11:55:37 2000
Message-ID: <39902D0A.371F88BF@digisle.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 08:53:47 -0700
From: Barrie Jones <bjones@digisle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Fraizer <nanog@EnterZone.Net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I used the Sonoma Access when I was with an ATM service provider a
little over a year ago. At the time, it was a very good product for
providing a LAN service across the WAN. It even did IMA well. It only
allowed VBR provisioning, but that may have changed by now. The design
of the box apparently made it easy for Sonoma to add features (their
marketing story), because they just had to come up with components that
were readily available. It seemed like they released features faster
than most vendors, although this may have just been the result of good
planning on their part. There wasn't support for HPOV, but the
web-based configuration system was pretty easy to use.
Hope this helps.
--Barrie Jones
John Fraizer wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any experiences with the Sonoma Access product? Good/Bad
> opinions? Success/Horror stories?
>
> ---
> John Fraizer
> EnterZone, Inc
