[30357] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SUMMARY: bw usage?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Fri Jul 28 13:28:08 2000
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:21:46 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET>
Cc: "(David M. Ramsey)" <dmr@webserve.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200007281405.PAA03896@NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.05.10007281321280.1812-100000@kerplewie.nac.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> You might want to look at cricket and RRDTool for a much more
> scalable solution. [http://cricket.soundforge.net/].
>
> >
> > - Cisco 6500 switches apparently support "Private VLANS", which
> > don't burn up IP addresses. Sounds cool, wish I had a 6500 ;-)
>
> I'd be interested in finding out more about this as we are currently
> using CAT 6500 switches and burning up IP addresses can you tell
> me more about this?
If I'm not mistaken, Private VLANs causes a big time split-horizon issue..
