[30273] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who is peer?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Majdi S. Abbas)
Mon Jul 24 02:28:06 2000
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 23:27:01 -0700
From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>
To: noc-eng@gurlmail.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000723232701.B11295@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20000724050538.27407.cpmta@c000.iad.cp.net>; from noc-eng@gurlmail.com on Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:05:38AM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:05:38AM -0400, noc-eng@gurlmail.com wrote:
> sirs and madams, our noc inform us of down peer on mae east router...
>
> MAE-East#show ip bgp sum | include Active
> 129.21.60.174 4 4385 18542 632128 0 0 0 1d03h Active
>
> this resolve to mae-east.csh.rit.edu host, not mae fddi or atm ip.
> maybe ebgp multi hop.
>
> contacted appliedtheory noc does not know vci/vpi or switch port. pls help!
appliedtheory may be RIT's upstream, but they're not going to be
in control of RIT's peering.
Considering that none of the route servers are seeing advertisements
from 4385, I'd say that RIT is probably aware of their problems. If not,
they will be soon.
--msa
