[30229] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Solaris load balancing?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dmitri Krioukov)
Wed Jul 19 20:24:59 2000

From: "Dmitri Krioukov" <dima@krioukov.net>
To: "foo" <foo@eek.org>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 20:37:37 -0400
Message-ID: <NCBBIKACLKNMKDHKKKNFEEOGEMAA.dima@krioukov.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20000719175320.O25273@sfx.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


a (sub)set of possible solutions is:
1) write simple script performing
   default gateway health checking (pinging)
   and adding/removing default gateways
2) use gated
3) use znyx cards (http://www.znyx.com)
--
dima.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> foo
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 6:53 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Solaris load balancing?
>
>
>
> What are the various options for load balancing across multiple interfaces
> which are connected to distinct switches/routers on a Solaris box?
> FEC/trunking wont work because the connections are to difference switches.
> Multiple default routes in Solaris appear to behave badly when one of the
> dest's is down, such that the route is not removed from the routing table
> and traffic is still sent in that direction (subject to TCP behavior), and
> it's round-robin versus something more interesting like MAC-hasing.
>
> I think I can do equal cost multipath with two default routes in Gated as
> well, but I'm not sure if Gated is any smarter about removing an
> unreachable route. Will eqmp work if I'm injecting two defaults with OSPF?
>
> Any other ideas?
>
> -Brian



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post