[30216] in North American Network Operators' Group
Filtering (was Re: RFC 1918)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Jul 18 21:18:52 2000
Message-Id: <200007190114.e6J1ElY30978@black-ice.cc.vt.edu>
To: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2000 19:22:44 EDT."
<Pine.BSF.4.21.0007181920520.95155-100000@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 21:14:47 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 19:22:44 EDT, "Richard A. Steenbergen" said:
> DoS then most people in one way or another, and filtering 1918 space is in
> absolutily NO way any kind of magic bullet or even worth the processor
> time (if you're gonna spend the time filtering there are much better
> things out there).
OK.. I'll bite - what's in YOUR favorite list of things to filter? ;)
Or more correctly, what's in your list for:
a) connectivy providers (who mostly have just transit packets between
customers)
b) endpoint sites - we may have 2 /16's and a lot of OC3/12 links,
but our 2 /16s shouldn't be transiting anything (as opposed to the
routing swamp just outside our border router).
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
