[30110] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RFC 1918
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Sat Jul 15 01:29:20 2000
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 22:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.net>
To: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: Rick <rallan@monmouth.com>, Bennett Todd <bet@rahul.net>,
"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007142342470.95155-100000@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007142220180.397-100000@anime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Rick wrote:
> > Richard I think you MISS two points which are at the center of this thread.
> > First every sub-hacker (ie, those who do NOT write their own source) will
> > usually use RFC1918 for any type of DOS attack as it is the recommended source
> > of attack (if you do not agree with this then this thread is pointless).
> I absolutily do not agree with this. I have never seen this behavior yet,
I have seen it many times
I have also seen DOS attacks which consisted primarily of 127.x.x.x
addresses
-Dan
