[30046] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eyers, Jerry)
Fri Jul 14 08:22:06 2000
Message-ID: <D97969034E41D311BFCA0008C7DF6B6203C327D5@ct-exch-01.corp.priceline.com>
From: "Eyers, Jerry" <Jerry.Eyers@priceline.com>
To: Bob Biver <bbiver@hotmail.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:19:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Unless you have a monopoly (hence the previous poster's comment).
I personally have seen the "we are a monopoly, you get the bandwidth
we dictate to you, not what you paid for" mentality in operation
in my local area DSL provider, after they changed bandwidth on my
service three times (always down, go figure).
Jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Biver [mailto:bbiver@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 10:49 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst
Addendum--
To to overwhelming responce:
I was simply trying to get a perspective on shaping PPPoE traffic. I would
*NEVER* misinform or otherwise attempt to defraud anyone. The account would
simply be cheaper than one that was advertised as full bandwidth. This
account would be put out there so that *everyone* would know what they were
buying 320K down with a 16K CIR up but burstable to 128. Sorry for the
confusion-
Bob-
PS Why does everyone think poeple are trying to 'rip" off customers? you
will not stay in business or in your job long if you do that.
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
