[29976] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Running BGP4 on a Core Router
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Cooper)
Tue Jul 11 13:13:04 2000
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:08:19 -0700
From: Dave Cooper <dcooper@gulp.org>
To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>
Cc: Bora Akyol <akyol@akyol.org>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000711100819.A20051@magi.gulp.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>,
Bora Akyol <akyol@akyol.org>, nanog@merit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20000710123513.B77150@skriver.dk>; from jesper@skriver.dk on Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 12:35:13PM +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Jesper Skriver wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 09:09:48PM -0700, Bora Akyol wrote:
> >
> > Even with MPLS, you need to run some sort of a routing protocol.
> > ISIS or OSPF with TE extensions would do.
>
> Yes - did I say any different ? This was specific regarding BGP4 ...
Assuming all traffic is MPLS. This is not always the case. However,
i'd be interested in knowing any network out there that has been able
to achieve 100% MPLS forwarding in the core and has turned BGP-4
off their cores...
dave
>
> > One can also use BGP with MPLS Label extensions as well. By the way, how
> > does this work with route reflectors?
>
> You will need a IGP.
>
> /Jesper
>
> --
> Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456
> Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks)
> Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
>
> One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
> One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
