[29972] in North American Network Operators' Group
Multiple providers w/o BGP (was: Re: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Timothy Brown)
Mon Jul 10 22:50:34 2000
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 22:48:32 -0400
From: Timothy Brown <tcb@ga.prestige.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000710224832.A974@scarybright.merseine.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0007102137240.10653-100000@dartboard.halachmi.net>; from alan@halachmi.net on Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 09:38:02PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Thank you for your interest in ArrowPoint Communications
> On June 23, 2000, Cisco Systems completed its acquisition of ArrowPoint
> Communications.
> ...
>
> No Cisco's, eh? (-;
The company I work for has its offices in a building Cisco mostly occupies.
There have been Arrowpoint engineering staff in and out all week getting
badges for a move-in within the next 2-3 weeks.
As an aside containing actual internet operational content, are there any
pointers onna web to redundancy and load-balancing solutions NOT using BGP?
I'm pretty much talking about two different providers with different
addressing schemes trying to connect to a third party who is a customer of
both providers, but who cannot justify a /20. What are my primary options
here for connectivity to the customer (short of adding three or four completely
seperate production networks to the justification request)?
> Alan
--
Timothy Brown
tcb@ga.prestige.net
