[29968] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Arrowpoint Load Balancing Devices
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Timothy Brown)
Mon Jul 10 21:17:56 2000
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:15:31 -0400
From: Timothy Brown <tcb@ga.prestige.net>
To: Karyn Ulriksen <kulriksen@publichost.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000710211531.A572@scarybright.merseine.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <0127E258EE29D3118A0F00609765B4483178B0@subnet-gw-00053.sitestream.net>; from kulriksen@publichost.com on Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 05:56:55PM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> The CS800 chassis is a pretty big box, about the size of a Cisco 7507. Last
> I checked it had 4x RAM capability of the CS100 (and 2x of the CS150).
> Since the major source of my woes appeared to be memory related, it didn't
> look like a good jump $-wise and u-wise (I'm guessing at 16u ?) to serve the
> same number of devices. As I remember, it's a 10 slot chassis - two for the
> management modules. How many slots do you have populated on your chassis?
> Are they all GigE or 10/100s or a mix?
I seem to remember the folks over at Andover being disgusted with the
Arrowpoint boxes after a recent denial-of-service attack. You might try
searching on Slashdot; I think they posted a pretty fair criticism of the
boxes.
(Slashdot was using CS100s, as I recall).
--
Timothy Brown
tcb@ga.prestige.net
/* I speak for myself, not my company. */
