[29917] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic,please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Payne)
Sun Jul 9 20:47:48 2000

Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 17:45:45 -0700
From: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000709174545.Y26769@haybaler.sackheads.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00f101bfe9a2$7397b880$258327d4@tbsinternet.com>; from ml-nanog@TBS-internet.com on Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 02:37:29PM +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 02:37:29PM +0200, JP Donnio wrote:
> That's interesting. This would prove the Abovenet's behaviour is evil; if
> they can filter on the /32 but choose to filter on the /24, they are morally
> undefendable. Even ORBS opposers cannot support such behavior I guess!

Why?  They can block any traffic on their network that they want.  If their 
customers don't like it, they can move elsewhere.

Cheers
John (nothing to do with abovenet except being a customer of a downstream)


-- 
John Payne      http://www.sackheads.org/jpayne/    john@sackheads.org
http://www.sackheads.org/uce/                    Fax: +44 870 0547954
        340% tax?           http://www.boycott-the-pumps.com/


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post