[29874] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Sat Jul 8 19:49:59 2000
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 19:45:44 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000708194544.A20498@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E13Az9d-000BtQ-00@rip.psg.com>; from randy@psg.com on Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 11:16:41AM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 11:16:41AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
>=20
> > ORBS forge headers ...
>=20
> but who cares? responsible admins don't pay attention to orbs.
Randy, why is everything binary with you? Anybody who disagrees with you is
either "stupid" or "irresponsible".
ORBS is a bad idea in mine and lots of other people's opinions, but that do=
esn't
mean every responsible administrator ignores them.
I know very responsible administrators who take ORBS seriously because their
customers want to email users of ORBS subscribers.
If your customers can't send mail to someone, it would be irresponsible to =
just
not care why at all.
Responsible admins don't let ORBS dictate to them, but also don't pretend t=
hey
don't exist. They're another datum, with the significance varying for each=
admin.
--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5Z70oEcl9bQ0RMt0RAqt6AKDg8ojwKKIpABJAif6GTEZjLItwLQCgpBP6
0GwYvdMIZUDmNQK4V769tPc=
=NlcH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--
