[29814] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Solmonson)
Fri Jul 7 14:04:01 2000
Message-ID: <39660DBE.48E203CC@speedera.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 10:05:02 -0700
From: Scott Solmonson <scosol@speedera.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tony bourke <tony@vegan.net>
Cc: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>,
"'Sutantyo, Danny'" <danny.sutantyo@intel.com>, lb-l@vegan.net,
nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
tony bourke wrote:
>
> True, thats why I don't particularly like LocalDirectors. Most of the
> other load balancing solutions do offer GigE, however. I prefer LB over
> clustering as it gives you more flexibility in what you use as far as your
> platform. Microsoft's clustering software limits you to microsoft, while
> I'm not sure if resonate will let you do both UNIX and Windows.
Thought I'd chime in-
(Used to be head of Tech Support at Resonate)
Yes, Central Dispatch works on Windows, Solaris, and Linux (maybe
others)-
And they can all co-exist within the same cluster.
--
Scott Solmonson
Speedera Networks Inc.
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
scosol@speedera.com / 408.970.1591
