[29680] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: bad idea?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Wed Jul 5 13:45:56 2000
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:43:33 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000705134333.A15082@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007051314320.21550-100000@overlord.e-gerbil.net>; from ras@e-gerbil.net on Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:24:05PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:24:05PM -0400, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
>=20
> answer it continues to use the same IP, which is routed normally. I
> believe this is how's Akamai load balancer works (try looking up
> www.yahoo.com from a name server on the left coast and on the right
> coast). I see absolutily nothing wrong with using DNS in this manner.
Bad example; a couple weeks ago, it was unavailable to many people for
a couple of days. :-)
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5Y3PFEcl9bQ0RMt0RAu7HAKD+u5TGDxRobbo2fUUh2icni4gqtgCfUgpt
usQreW3K54Dj8EdRqfjADlg=
=CGJs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8--
