[29658] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Sat Jul 1 19:20:04 2000
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 19:17:53 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000701191753.A9141@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ"
In-Reply-To: <000b01bfe372$3347e5b0$eaaf6cc7@PEREGRIN>; from rmeyer@mhsc.com on Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 08:37:00AM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 08:37:00AM -0700, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>=20
> makes key management unbelieveably complex. Since I can't get PGP
> to work with SSL and I CAN get X.509 to encrypt message content,
> guess which drops out the door.
>=20
> In case you haven't figured it out yet, it's an integration
> issue, not strictly a technnical one.
Yet another reason why nobody's bothered to make a robust PGP keyserving
network.
We are geeks; we aren't indicative of what the general public uses or will
use.
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5XnwhEcl9bQ0RMt0RAdzeAKChMPa+UMzxLVHkNdufznmcybBa0gCg0CFj
xa2BZqMjk30zfxaBVRafiUA=
=m+U2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--
