[29651] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: PGP kerserver infrastructure
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (L. Sassaman)
Sat Jul 1 17:23:45 2000
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: "L. Sassaman" <rabbi@quickie.net>
To: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: "'Michael Helm'" <helm@fionn.es.net>, nanog@merit.edu,
pgp-keyserver-folk@flame.org
In-Reply-To: <000b01bfe372$3347e5b0$eaaf6cc7@PEREGRIN>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.QNWS_2.0007011419350.16277-100000@thetis.deor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
> > L. Sassaman
> > Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2000 2:58 AM
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Michael Helm wrote:
> >
> > > "L. Sassaman" writes:
> > > > X.509 is a much older and cruftier standard. PGP is
>
> > > I think is up to customers to decide.
> >
> > I think customers *have* decided. Where is PEM now?
>
> PEM is being used on every ecommerce site site now, to implement
Privacy Enhanced Mail != Secure Socket Layer. And this discussion is
becoming absurd... I regret getting baited into a flame war, and will not
continue down this line of discussion.
__
L. Sassaman
System Administrator |
Technology Consultant | "Common sense is wrong."
icq.. 10735603 |
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Practical C Programming
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.
iD8DBQE5XmDhPYrxsgmsCmoRAgUwAKDuBDWIiX7mEAhpQx4Or2ytPLw1cgCg2Xug
ycrobrrhkw0sWJaZTmv7MRk=
=7fuO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
