[29641] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: PGP kerserver infrastructure
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (L. Sassaman)
Fri Jun 30 16:53:51 2000
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: "L. Sassaman" <rabbi@quickie.net>
To: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20000630155706.A6455@eiv.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.QNWS_2.0006301333450.10415-100000@thetis.deor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Shawn McMahon wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 12:40:46PM -0700, L. Sassaman wrote:
> >
> > > usable to many. PGP works with ancient CLI mailers and older GUI
> > > mailers. All modern GUI mailers support X.509 keys for message
> > > encryption and even let you use the same cert for SSL protected
> > > POP3. PGP, OTOH, only encrypts the message body, this is why it's
> >
> > Ever heard of PGP/MIME? Look at RFC 2015.
>
> To be fair, even you aren't using it. :-)
Correct. Stanard clear-signed PGP messages are supported more widely, and
I have no need to sign my headers. If I were sending messages with
attachments, etc., it would be a different case.
__
L. Sassaman
System Administrator |
Technology Consultant | "Common sense is wrong."
icq.. 10735603 |
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Practical C Programming
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.
iD8DBQE5XQSEPYrxsgmsCmoRAiwgAKDKtXTMhTxzZMTlc755ms7Pse2v/wCfVkdj
xgErVTPufaQkFpTFGgDaAvs=
=QdM+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
