[29635] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: PGP kerserver infrastructure
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (L. Sassaman)
Fri Jun 30 15:59:01 2000
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: "L. Sassaman" <rabbi@quickie.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, pgp-keyserver-folk@flame.org
In-Reply-To: <E1386ho-0003Ci-00@rip.psg.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.QNWS_2.0006301249590.10070-100000@thetis.deor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Most of the encrypted traffic on the Internet is PGP traffic. Methinks you
> > are a tad confused.
>
> if you actually meant signed/encrypted email, then i agree with you.
Oops. Sorry, yes, that's what I mean.
> if i take you literally, i disagree and believe ssl and ssh predominate with
> ipsec vpns catching up.
Yep. Thanks for correcting that. What I was refering to is encrypted
traffic where the user is actively encrypting something (email, attached
email files, etc.)
- --Len.
__
L. Sassaman
System Administrator |
Technology Consultant | "Common sense is wrong."
icq.. 10735603 |
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Practical C Programming
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.
iD8DBQE5XPo7PYrxsgmsCmoRAmT8AJ4gbXafoNyvQG1GOhbQlK6Ud49eWACeNs0s
Yyjmnm1u0k6ZSl8J3TBcwy4=
=wlAR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
