[29549] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Global Crossing Network Problem.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jesper Skriver)
Tue Jun 27 19:50:01 2000
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:05:07 +0200
From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>
To: Mohamed Hirse <madlion@justin.net>
Cc: Steve Nash <snash@lightning.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000628000507.C74038@skriver.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.05.10006271732310.11735-100000@justin.net>; from madlion@justin.net on Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 05:35:32PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 05:35:32PM -0400, Mohamed Hirse wrote:
> I only said SONET because it's layer one. If you can reroute
> traffic to other circuits that are terminated on other routers that
> have APS enabled you can offset any or almost any fiber cut. Unless both
> Working and Protect get taken out by some strange reason. What do you
> propose?
Having 2 non-protected diverse routed circuits, both live carrying traffic,
but not more than one can carry all the traffic when the other fail ...
/Jesper
--
Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456
Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks)
Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
