[29446] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Borchers)
Fri Jun 23 13:58:38 2000
Message-Id: <200006231756.NAA00246@ns2.harpweek.com>
From: "Mark Borchers" <markb@infi.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 12:56:32 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
In-reply-to: <20000623103740.B17707@vorlon.merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 23 Jun 00, at 10:37, Jeff Haas wrote:
<entire paragraphs deleted for brevity>
> One planned use of the planned Route Server extensions (RSng++) is
> to allow real-time correlation of routing data against the totality
> of the IRR. This will likely result in a publicly accessible
> database of what the Route Servers have seen in the global routing
> mesh. For completeness, such a database may also include views from
> other routers. One possible use for such a database is an report similar
> to the CIDR report showing non-registered routes.
Are there any plans to correlate route registry objects against
address registry databases?
I believe that one of the roots of this thread is the need to validate
the legitimacy of not only routes, but registered route objects.
Although it is too much to expect that route objects will match up
cleanly with address block assignments at the outset, performing
such a correlation would at least identify the scope of the problem.
--
Mark Borchers Splitrock Services
Network Engineering 9012 New Trails Dr.
(281) 465-1200 The Woodlands, TX 77381
mborchers@splitrock.net http://www.splitrock.net/
