|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: "Miguel A.L. Paraz" <map@iphil.net> To: gopi@ece.iisc.ernet.in (Gopi K Garge) Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 21:14:51 +0800 (GMT+0800) Cc: nanog@merit.edu, local-ir@apnic.net In-Reply-To: <9605160833.AA08381@ece.iisc.ernet.in> from "Gopi K Garge" at May 16, 96 02:03:10 pm Hello, Gopi K Garge wrote: > IMHO, in the context of the AP region, I guess we are overlooking the > user perspective - locally available "Internet" content. Barring > .au, .sg, .kr, .hk (?), .jp and .tw, I do not see any major effort > around to provide locally, content that is available in the US > be it the GNU archive, the WU archive or one-of-those Beatles > song and lyrics archive - result - good amount of traffic to the > US. With limited bandwidth, updating these archives would be slow, and, you wouldn't know yet if there are enough people accessing these to justify getting a mirror. Caching should help getting commonly requested information faster. > When one sees such traffic trends, why would an ISP even think in > terms of investing in a link to a place other than the US - the cost > permitting ? In the long term, as the Internet becomes more common, regional content will become more important, IMHO. So develop the local content - and the local infrastructure - and regional intranets, and virtual private networks - will come in. -- miguel a.l. paraz <map@iphil.net> iphil communications, makati city, tech problems, to <support@iphil.net> philippines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |