[29389] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Kell)
Wed Jun 21 00:58:52 2000
Message-ID: <39504909.819C4146@utc.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 00:48:09 -0400
From: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell@utc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bora Akyol <akyol@akyol.org>
Cc: Bennett Todd <bet@rahul.net>,
"Roeland Meyer (E-mail)" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>,
'Bob Biver' <bbiver@hotmail.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Bora Akyol wrote:
>
> If you put all of the users on seperate switch ports, then would they be
> able to snoop each other's traffic? At least the switches that I have seen
> prevent this behavior unless you put a particular switch port in "monitor"
> mode.
>
> As long as all rooms in this hotel are on seperate switch ports, you would
> basically be OK even without using VLANs.
Bzzzzztttt... check out dsniff (do a web search). It allows sniffing
of anyone on the VLAN of the host or client (unless you get down to
static ARP entries, yecchhh, do it sparingly).
Jeff Kell <jeff-kell@utc.edu>
