[29280] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Summary: Bay Area Power (2000-06-14)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Danny McPherson)
Thu Jun 15 19:02:59 2000

Message-Id: <200006152301.RAA21164@tcb.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
Reply-To: danny@tcb.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 17:01:57 -0600
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



I believe they're more so the result of "brown outs" as the power companies 
attempt to "proactively" deal with extremely high loads.  Given your message, 
I guess it does make sense for the power companies to first inconvenience 
business customers that 1) use a substantial amount of resources and 2) 
already have alternative method of supporting themselves.

Of course, I'd guess there's considerable ground for objection to this model.

-danny

> In a conversation with an MFS engineer today I mentioned the problems
> in the Bay area.  He previously worked for SNET (Southern New
> England Telephone, now part of SBC) for many years and said it was
> standard practice for them to disconnect COs from the grid and run
> off generator power for hours or even a day or two during the
> summer season.
> 
> I was under the impression that these power shortages were the
> result of less over-engineering on the part of power companies due
> to deregulation but maybe this isn't such a new situation after all?
> 




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post