[29268] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: exchange point media (was: Re: MAE-EAST Moving? ...)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Jun 15 10:35:34 2000

From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net>
Cc: "Lauren F. Nowlin" <ren@us.onyx.net>,
	Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-Id: <E132adV-000CYN-00@rip.psg.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 07:28:49 -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


>> i have been suggesting a DACS for many years.  then all one needs is one
>> channelized oc48 and it's fat city.
> As passive DWDM becomes dirt cheap, having a loop carrying to a
> redundant optical (wavelength) cross-connect has advantages, like
> you can bilaterally upgrade your peering line cards without having
> to bother to inform / be bothered by the exchange point (remember
> MAE-ATM).

is adding new 'terminations' not a bit more of a bother?

> I can't see why people would want to put in less than an OC-3.

when you want a lot of peers.

but the self-provisioning would be way cool.

lunch or dinner wednesday?

randy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post