[29090] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard A. Steenbergen)
Fri Jun 9 16:19:06 2000
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 16:14:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006091602220.9678-100000@pimpbox.latency.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006091602480.2906-100000@pkitty.e-gerbil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000 rdobbins@netmore.net wrote:
> > Gee, I thought that IP, BGP, DNS, ACLs, and so on worked the same
> > for women as for men.
>
> No. When it doesn't work for a man, we scream "BITCH!" When it
> doesn't work for a woman, they scream "BASTARD!" I know it's a subtle
> difference but, it's STILL a difference.
Your request to Majordomo@tch.org:
subscribe net-grrls ras@pkitty.e-gerbil.net
has been forwarded to the owner of the "net-grrls" list for approval.
Hrm does this mean its open to women only? I wanted to read the tips for
color coordinating your GSRs, offices, and makeup.
*runs* of course you all know I'm j/k, but this does bring up an
interesting concept for a nanog-dating service... :P
On a slightly serious note, I always wonder about the creation of advocacy
groups where the creation of its matching counterpart (net-dudes?) not as
a response to the original group creation would be considered absurd and
in bad taste.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/humble
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
