[29056] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re[2]: DSL (was shopping for NOCs)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (W.D.McKinney)
Wed Jun 7 01:46:52 2000
From: "W.D.McKinney" <deem@wdm.com>
Message-Id: <200006070546.VAA29342@wdm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 21:46:06 -0800 (AKDT)
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <008001bfd042$83895e20$b7bd0118@irvn1.occa.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
"Julian Eccli" <jeccli@ubnetworks.net> wrote:
>
> >Doesn't this have more to do with the philosophy of the company
> >providing service than the technology being deployed (DSL)?
> >Maybe the problem is that DSL tends to involve LEC people who are
> >infected with the obsolete lazy-monopoly attitude of the incumbents.
>
> Hey! I used to work for a LEC in the Frozen East!
>
> I take absolutely no offense to the above comment :-) !
>
>
Having worked for 2 ILECS previously, they are definetly
"infected with the obsolete lazy-monopoly attitude of the incumbents."
NOI
/Dee