[28979] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: pop server in an ISP environment

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Muljawan Hendrianto)
Tue May 30 06:39:38 2000

Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 18:37:33 +0800
From: Muljawan Hendrianto <muljawan.hendrianto@siemens.com.sg>
To: "Roeland Meyer (E-mail)" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000530183733.A14933@mail-sg.siemens.com.sg>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <004d01bfca08$da760520$eaaf6cc7@PEREGRIN>; from Roeland Meyer (E-mail) on Tue, May 30, 2000 at 12:29:55AM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Hello all,

thanks to everybody who has replied to my email !
Yes, my sole concern is actually the performance of my pop server when my pop3 users base getting larger.
But I think with a E250/220 running having 2 CPUs , 1MB of RAM, around 200GB HD I should be able to handle up to 20000 pop3 users easily, shouldn't I ?
Roeland, you mentioned in your email about XTND XMIT, may I know what is that ?
And about HA for Qpopper, are you saying that you have HA agent for Qpopper ?

thanks,
Muljawan


On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 12:29:55AM -0700, Roeland Meyer (E-mail) wrote:
> 
> Angels and pin-heads ...
> 
> Y'all both missed the point. Although Greg's dissertation on
> uuids was interesting, the salient fact is that you run out of
> machine way before you run out of uuid, in most practical cases.
> Who uses NIS these days? It's taboo around here and NFS is only
> allowed for Unix server-to-server file shares, even those get
> reviewed, on a must-need basis. The point of my message was to
> answer the question, not to debate relative kernel
> merits/methods. Who cares how many uuids a given kernel can
> support as long is the number is larger than the silicon can
> support? So what is my original numbers were a little dated, they
> were still irrelevent in determining the number of users a system
> can support. My point was that the planned load is the sole
> determinant. The original poster was asking a system capacity
> question, not a religious question.
> 
> <sheesh> You'd think I was in DOMAIN-POLICY.
> 
> 
> > Greg A. Woods: Monday, May 29, 2000 7:36 PM
> >
> > [ On Monday, May 29, 2000 at 19:32:08 (-0600), Rick Kelly
> wrote: ]
> > > Subject: Re: pop server in an ISP environment
> > >
> > > And meanwhile, SCO Open Desktop and SCO UNIX had a limit of
> > 65k uids,
> > > as well as a mechanism that tried to keep sysadmins from
> reusing the
> > > uids of old users.
> >
> > I know of a couple of sites still running various forms of
> > SCO UNIX for
> > Internet servers, but I've *NEVER* heard of any real ISP
> > running one!  ;-)
> >
> > > AIX 4.x ships with NIS that won't support a passwd file
> greater than
> > > 10k users.
> >
> > Weird.  AIX-3.x (and later the final releases of AIX-2.x) was
> > the first
> > system I remember seeing that had the "nobody" UID/GID actually
> listed
> > as 4294967294 (-2).
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post