[28962] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: UUNet?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Fri May 26 17:40:31 2000
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 17:38:33 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: Martin Cooper <mjc@cooper.org.uk>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <E12vO8P-0003Tv-00@nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.05.10005261738160.1756-100000@shakalaka>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
As is: http://www.nac.net/outages.asp
which, if I could find the link, goes back to 1995...
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> Steve Kann <stevek@SteveK.COM> writes:
>
> > I have to say, that in my experience, the only company who practices
> > full disclosure is AboveNet. Even to outsiders, they have the current
> > capacity and usage levels of just about every single link in their
> > network, as well as their tech announcements archive open to the public.
> > I've seen other "pretty" network status pages from providers, but none
> > show you the useful information you need.
>
> INSnet (admittedly not a tier-1) has a pretty neat policy on
> disclosure, even including a detailed description of the fixes
> for problems as well as the causes of them, which is nice.
>
> See <URL:http://www1.insnet.net/> for an idea of it.
>
> M.
>
>
