[28840] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Class B address routing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bradly Walters)
Thu May 18 19:33:26 2000
Reply-To: <bwalters@inet-direct.com>
From: "Bradly Walters" <bwalters@inet-direct.com>
To: "Kenji Anzai" <kenji@itochu.net>,
"Glenn Staniforth" <glenns@UUNET.CA>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 18:24:32 -0500
Message-ID: <GDECIHPBJAGGIFOKEIHEGEJPCBAA.bwalters@inet-direct.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3924714729F.B99FKENJI@smtp.itochu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> >
> > |--------- |
> > | POP A |
> > | /17 |------|
> > |----------| | |--------|
> > |-----| ISP C |-- Internet---X----ISP D
> > | ---------| | |--------| Filtered out here…
> > | POP B |------|
> > | /17 |
> > -----------
> >
Is BGP even necessary in this example?
If POP A and POP B are stub networks, why not
just use static routing and let ISP C handle
the BGP appropriately?
-brad (Rural CNE)
bwalters@inet-direct.com
