[28804] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: "Simple" Multi-Homing ? (was Re: CIDR Report)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dmitri Krioukov)
Tue May 16 18:11:56 2000
From: "Dmitri Krioukov" <dima@dimension.net>
To: "Jim Mercer" <jim@reptiles.org>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>, <chris.williams@third-rail.net>,
<woods@weird.com>, "Todd Sandor" <tsandor@home.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 18:22:41 -0400
Message-ID: <NCBBIKACLKNMKDHKKKNFAEGKEKAA.dima@dimension.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20000516171049.B24463@reptiles.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> Jim Mercer
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 5:11 PM
> To: Dmitri Krioukov
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu; chris.williams@third-rail.net; woods@weird.com;
> Todd Sandor
> Subject: Re: "Simple" Multi-Homing ? (was Re: CIDR Report)
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 05:15:15PM -0400, Dmitri Krioukov wrote:
> > it is extremely obvious to me that in the free market environment the
> > winners are those who use the second approach.
>
> yes, but by selling your customers somthing that is not
> appropriate, you turn
> your customers into losers, which eventually will bite you in the ass.
this ass biting statement is too loose. consider the situation on the
ip te front. look at the recent oxc thread on this list. isn't anything
biting you? you've been selling ip...
--
dima.
