[2866] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Tue May 7 20:51:42 1996
From: matthew@scruz.net (Matthew Kaufman)
Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 17:48:54 -0700
In-Reply-To: bmanning@isi.edu (Bill Manning)
"Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service" (May 7, 14:53)
To: bmanning@isi.edu (Bill Manning), inet-access@earth.com
Cc: kwe@6sigmanets.com, nanog@merit.edu
Original message <199605072153.AA13332@zephyr.isi.edu>
From: bmanning@isi.edu (Bill Manning)
Date: May 7, 14:53
Subject: Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service
>
> >
> > On Tue, 7 May 1996, Kent W. England wrote:
> >
> > > Pac Bell has announced their LA NAP is operational. Contact and details below.
> >
> > Is there not already a MAE-LA? Why would thay have an LA NAP if even
> > MAE-LA hasn't taken off as of yet?
> >
> > Just a question.
> >
> > Christian Nielsen
>
> Yes, there is. I would expect that the NAP service is offering
> is an extention of the existing BayArea service. This approach
> reduces the cost of entry of entry for people you are in the So.Cal.
> area to a local loop charge.
> It appears that thye believe that a "distributed" service is
> more effective than two seperate exchanges.
>
>
> --
> --bill
>-- End of excerpt from Bill Manning
As far as I know, PacBell wouldn't be permitted to extend PVCs between
the LA NAP and the SF NAP
-matthew kaufman
matthew@scruz.net
