[28414] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Proposed NANOG topics
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rubens Kuhl Jr.)
Fri Apr 28 22:56:05 2000
From: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rkuhljr@uol.com.br>
To: "Sean Donelan" <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 23:49:43 -0300
Message-ID: <005b01bfb185$925da2c0$5cf1e7c8@users.uol.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20000429023257.14637.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> On a more proactive stance, I'd like to see a Best Common Practice for
> how a service provider configures its management network. We've all seen
> those USR modems stuffed in ISP racks for "out-of-band" management which
> are likely connected to POTS lines anyone could call if they knew the
> "secret" phone number.
USR Couriers can have passwords of their own, call-back, and those things
still work when data network is down.
Rubens Kuhl Jr.
