|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 15:00:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Cappuccio <chris@dqc.org> To: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com> Cc: "Greene, Dylan" <DGreene@NaviSite.com>, 'Paul Froutan' <pfroutan@rackspace.com>, rmeyer@mhsc.com, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0004281429440.19257-100000@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com> Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0004281457540.31198-100000@dqc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: | | | Hello Dylan, Knew this was coming . But I'd hoped that | the supported platforms would have been a little larger . | Just the 7200 & UP . Seems cisco thinks ssh puts a bit | of load on a cpu ? I can't see that for just a terminal | session though . Twyl, JimL | The ssh server should optimally generate new keys every so often (every few hours?) This generally takes a lot of CPU time, and on a 2501 it would probably take quite a while!!! Also, the ssh server requires more memory then a telnet server. This is a problem for older routers. While I'm at it, I believe Cisco is/will be using the OpenSSH code for newer implementations of ssh under IOS. --- Reverend Chris Cappuccio http://www.dqc.org/~chris/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |