[28306] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering Table Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (k claffy)
Mon Apr 24 21:08:29 2000
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 18:06:19 -0700
From: k claffy <kc@caida.org>
To: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Message-ID: <20000424180619.A15010@caida.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20000424103214.00812c60@max.ibm.net.il>; from hank@att.net.il on Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 10:32:14AM +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
At 13:28 19/04/00 -0600, Christian Nielsen wrote:
The Oct 1999 issue of Data Communications (RIP), had a comprehensive
article about peering:
http://www.data.com/issue/991007/peering.html
They detailed private and public peering (see their tables). They did it
using MIDS which did 1.2 million traceroutes from various beacons located
thruout the Internet.
Very easy to determine who is a tier-1 and tier-2 ISP.
randy said:
only one problem, the data are badly broken.
that & the article.author seemed to have
a penchant for fictional quotes.
(i asked her about it when that article came out
but never got a response, few others were
bizarrely quoted as well)
[cell-phone quality, ha,
it's been years since i had Internet connectivity
anywhere near as bad as my current cell phone connectivity.
unless you count multicast. but who would.]
