[28281] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering Table Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (I Am Not An Isp)
Mon Apr 24 10:01:20 2000
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000424063658.00bf0be0@mail.ianai.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 06:39:40 -0700
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: I Am Not An Isp <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <200004211524.LAA00283@ns2.harpweek.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 10:21 AM 4/21/00 -0500, Mark Borchers wrote:
>
>You omitted the fact that the 1500 byte packets carry a bunch
>of paid advertising, and thus are already revenue-producing.
And you omitted the fact that the 64 byte ACKs carry traffic by paying
customers, and thus are already revenue-producing.
Does the fact that both networks are being paid by their customers mean
that neither should pay the other? Or that one should always pay the other?
TTFN,
patrick
--
I Am Not An Isp - www.ianai.net
ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
"Think of it as evolution in action." - Niven & Pournelle
(Enable? We dunt need no stinkin' enable!!)
