[28264] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Question about strain on the A root server
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Sat Apr 22 15:34:21 2000
Message-Id: <200004221931.PAA29736@oa.eiv.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 15:31:37 EDT
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: "Nick Patience" <nick@patience.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: smcmahon@eiv.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, "Nick Patience" wrote:
>
> NSI seems slightly unsure as to the main reason for the increase in hits,
> but speculates that one of the reasons may be
> says the main reason for this is that ISP's are using different caching
> techniques and more & more searches are going right to the top of the
> tree
> than before.
>
> What do people on this list feel about this as a reason? It seems a
> little
> woolly to me.
It seems rational to me.
I know I used to forward off to my upstream and rely on their cache, but
now I just dig it straight from the root servers and rely on my own cache.
Probably less efficient, but takes a point of failure out of the loop.
It's difficult getting your upstream to admit to DNS problems sometimes.